It looks like the updated design addresses only part of comment 72 #1. Comment 70 items 2, 3, 4, and 5 are addressed by the updated design (v.42), but comment 70 item 1 had no action nor explanation.
Please address comment 70 item 1, i.e.:
1. Why specifically call out job_sort_formula_threshold, but none of the other [existing sched object] attributes?
Regarding Comment 72 #2, this was referring to what is now listed under "Notes" at the bottom of the design. (Sorry if there was confusion, the current system for tracking versions and comments and matching them up makes it hard to easily map between comments and versions...).
Please address comment 36 item 8 (which referred to design v.11 Interface 9, which became the Notes section in a later revision). In particular, the Notes section v.42 says "things might be broken" and "may not have a view", but does not define any options as unsupported/erroneous nor does the design define the new behavior of these options. One guideline for all designs is that everything PBS Pro already supports will continue to be supported (with the same semantics as in prior version) unless the design explicitly states otherwise. If some set of options are supported, then the design should define the actual behavior; if some set of options are not supported, then no behavior needs to be defined, but the options need to be explicitly listed as not being supported. (Ideally, unsupported options also result in errors,)
The problem with the v.42 language is that it doesn't say anything is unsupported (so PBS Pro supports these options), but the design doesn't explain the new behavior. Please either mark some set(s) of options as unsupported or fully explain the behavior of using these (supported) options.